Wapsi Square

Slice of supernatural life YA comic PG-13 to R
  • Home
  • About
  • Book Store
  • Bluesky
  • Twitch
  • Forum
  • Archive
DeviantART pinterest YouTube RSS
"No Teasing"
<< First < Prev 54Comments Next > Last >>
No Teasing
<< FIrst < Prev Random 54Comments Next > Last >>

Friends

  • Dumbing of Age
  • OGLAF (NSFW)
  • Something Positive
Buy Me A Coffee

Mastodon

Latest Medusa Comic

No Teasing

by Paul Taylor on January 18, 2012 at 12:00 am
Story: Wapsi-Archive
Comments RSS

Discussion (54) ¬

  1. Joe Minotaur
    January 18, 2012, 12:02 am | # | Reply

    Here Kitty, Kitty, Kitty.

    • Valkeiper
      January 18, 2012, 2:38 am | # | Reply

      isn’t that usually said by the 2000 pound canary?

      not that said canary would be more than a tasty tidbit for Shelly… Or Monica… or Georgette… or Bud… or

      anybody else notice almost all the powerful characters in this webcomic are females?

      the only male with power is a avatar of drunkeness.

      • Joe Minotaur
        January 18, 2012, 4:56 am | #

        Peersonally, I don’t think that the men in their lives mind all that much.

      • illiad
        January 18, 2012, 6:10 am | #

        🙂 I think you will find that most hispanic / american indian girls are powerful and sexy… And the men are very happy!!!! 😀 😀

        and the short girls… wow, double powerhouse!!!! 😀 I know, I married one 🙂 🙂 🙂

      • Julie
        January 18, 2012, 11:08 am | #

        Georgette’s not all-powerful…she’s just all-eating. 😛

      • Yamara
        January 18, 2012, 11:16 am | #

        Valkeiper, I poured over Wapsi Square pretty thoroughly a few months ago, and it very nearly fails the Bechdel test— if the genders are reversed.

        I think there’s a moment where Kevin and Yummy Tea exchange a line about art. But otherwise, when alone, the guys only talk about the ladies.

        Don’t know if it’s deliberate, but I find that pretty damn awesome.

      • SoWhyMe
        January 18, 2012, 10:55 pm | #

        That must be the stupidest, most pointless test/yardstick I’ve ever seen.

      • Yamara
        January 19, 2012, 12:01 am | #

        It’s a thought experiment, generally acknowledged as very insightful. The very fact that examples of it’s reversed-gendered version are statistically microscopic makes it a relevant topic in writing across all media today.

      • SoWhyMe
        January 19, 2012, 1:07 am | #

        It’s not a thought experiment. It’s a silly feminist criteria for judging the quality of a movie.

      • Yamara
        January 19, 2012, 9:33 am | #

        No, it’s not about individual movies, though that makes for good flame wars (don’t movies always?) Like Schrodinger’s Cat, it’s about understanding the larger implications:

        “It starts with the very basic question: of all the many, many characters in this movie — ten, or fifteen, or twenty, or more — are at least two of those characters female? And in this first step, an astonishing number of movies fail. And if we adjust for race and ignore gender, we still see a surprising number of movies that fail.”

        (Ana Mardoll at the Slacktiverse)

      • Yamara
        January 19, 2012, 10:02 am | #

        In the original comic, it’s obvious that it’s the dearth of movies available that speak to the characters, not the quality of an individual film.

        Mmm. Pancakes!

      • W.
        January 19, 2012, 10:12 am | #

        Most war movies would fail that test, so I guess “Saving Private Ryan” or “Band of Brothers” would not be good?

      • Yamara
        January 19, 2012, 2:40 pm | #

        It’s not really about good or bad, or even feminist or not-feminist. (The Mardoll piece mentions comparing ST:Voyager with Firefly: Firefly doesn’t pass BT very well.)

        The tldr: “That is what the Bechdel test is for. Not for the one-off artistic efforts, but for the aggregate effect as a whole on minority voices in our culture.”

        What would the modern combat genre look like with more women characters in conversation? Seriously.

        This is one reason why Paul’s work stands out. It explores these questions and possibilities earnestly, as we’re seeing in this storyline.

  2. Opus the Poet
    January 18, 2012, 12:02 am | # | Reply

    Bud is feeling guilty about something…

    • DJ
      January 18, 2012, 12:43 am | # | Reply

      Most likely because she said “Yeah right” with the tone of voice that is usually followed by the words “About that…”

    • Jay-Em
      January 18, 2012, 2:10 am | # | Reply

      Yup!
      Her conscience is nagging her. Probably because Shelly did NOT actually “started it”

  3. Casey
    January 18, 2012, 12:16 am | # | Reply

    So, basically Shelly’s description of Bud’s role is accurate.

    • Dave
      January 18, 2012, 1:23 am | # | Reply

      Incitement to riot? Check.
      Instigation of whirling mayhem? Check.
      Felonious air-guitar, after the fact? Check.

      Seems as if Bud’s hangover does include the optional (and very human) taste of “Gee, now I wish I hadn’t done that” in her mouth.

      • SoWhyMe
        January 18, 2012, 3:53 am | #

        All in all, though, it’s probably good it’s out in the open and being delt with in some manner. This time it was relatively minor. Keeping it bottled up inside too long could have resullted in much worse mayhem when it did finally burst forth.

      • Dave
        January 18, 2012, 9:59 am | #

        Agreed. No fatalities, no irrevocable horrid incident with Justin, no obvious public sphinx transformations that would have required explanation or coverups, Shelly is well aware of and responsibly concerned about her trigger-ability, Monica and the gang know the score, Phix has stepped in to play Dutch Auntie and help Shelly learn to maintain control… all good.

        And, Bud gets coffee and pancakes for breakfast.

        All in all, as post-mayhem breakfasts go… it could have been much wurst.

        /clink/

      • Julie
        January 18, 2012, 11:16 am | #

        Felonious?? I think the air guitar was awesomely timed and appropriate…therefore not felonious. 😛

      • Dave
        January 18, 2012, 11:27 am | #

        Oh, you misunderstand. Bud was mimicing the style of guitar-playing (well, it was a stringed instrument very much like a guitar) that she remembered being popularized by a famous Lanthian musician-priest, back in the days of her living youth. You know… Felonious Monk? Possibly an ancestor of our own punnish bmonk?

      • Opus the Poet
        January 18, 2012, 9:59 pm | #

        {Rattles Pun Jar menacingly}

  4. Atomic
    January 18, 2012, 12:32 am | # | Reply

    Hmmm… one to light the fuze, the other to explode…

  5. Dave
    January 18, 2012, 12:36 am | # | Reply

    I think that last, qualifies as an Oops.

    • Stigmartyr762
      January 18, 2012, 10:19 am | # | Reply

      A very big OOPS!

  6. Sitnalta
    January 18, 2012, 1:08 am | # | Reply

    Uh oh.

    I don’t think Shelly was telling the whole truth to Monica.

  7. Fnord
    January 18, 2012, 1:13 am | # | Reply

    As Paul Harvey used to say, “And now … the rest of the story“!

  8. david4250
    January 18, 2012, 1:45 am | # | Reply

    Seems to me that Bud is the most “normal” of the three, in terms of emotions and insecurities. Brandi is very controlled and methodical, and while I have known people like her, I’ve always been wary of when they might explode. Jin is still recovering from her “repair” and has not yet shown what she will be. I like Bud. She’s fallible, and the most human.

    • Julie
      January 18, 2012, 11:21 am | # | Reply

      There’s a good reason why Bud’s been my favorite character for a long time. 😉

  9. DJ
    January 18, 2012, 1:59 am | # | Reply

    Mmmmmmmm… Pancakes.

    • Opus the Poet
      January 18, 2012, 2:20 am | # | Reply

      We’re dealing with beings that could potentially wipe out all life on the planet and all you can say is “Mmmmmmmm… Pancakes.“? Well I guess you have to know where your priorities are. Mmmmmmmm… Pancakes.

      • david4250
        January 18, 2012, 2:22 am | #

        I flip over flapjacks.

      • Valkeiper
        January 18, 2012, 2:28 am | #

        David

        >shakes pun bottle<

        pay up.

      • david4250
        January 18, 2012, 9:51 am | #

        >clink<

      • bmonk
        January 18, 2012, 11:02 am | #

        Meh. Flapjacks leave me pretty flat.

      • SoWhyMe
        January 18, 2012, 3:47 am | #

        World destruction? Flaming plasma death? Meh, Later maybe. In the meantime we all still gotta eat. So, yeah … mmmmmmm … pancakes.

      • Julie
        January 18, 2012, 11:22 am | #

        Well said, sir!

      • illiad
        January 18, 2012, 6:14 am | #

        potentially wipe out all life on the planet?? nah, it only takes a good coffe and pancakes to calm that beast…. 😛 🙂

      • bmonk
        January 18, 2012, 11:04 am | #

        It’s not that the end of life as we know it and the destruction of Earth are not on our minds, but we were well trained: You need a good breakfast to start out the day properly.

        We’re just keeping our priorities in order here!

  10. Valkeiper
    January 18, 2012, 2:27 am | # | Reply

    Yeah, pour a little honey over them and >smack<. there is no better breakfast 'wake-up'.

  11. Valkeiper
    January 18, 2012, 2:32 am | # | Reply

    I’m getting the impression that Bud is agreeing Shelly’s version is pretty close to the truth (even though Bud never heard it).

    I still want to see Bud’s side of the story.

  12. Sonicthunder
    January 18, 2012, 5:07 am | # | Reply

    One of these days, Brandi and Monica are going to remember “Tell Bud, Shelly, and Jin the obvious BEFORE they go and do exactly the opposite.”

    I’d include Tina in there, but we all know she intentionally doesn’t tell them beforehand. It’s more fun for her this way.

  13. TheDoctor
    January 18, 2012, 8:54 am | # | Reply

    I’ll take my pancakes with the Butter Pecan syrup they serve at Ihop, and a hot Tea, Earl Grey or Lipton is Okay, with bacon, scrambled eggs and hash browns on the side if you please. (where was I?) Oh YEAH! Now lets hear Acacias’ side to all this. Maybe seeing Shelly do what she did put the “Fear Of God” into her.

  14. Dave
    January 18, 2012, 9:49 am | # | Reply

    Not all that long ago, Bud was telling Brandi that she wanted to have the experience of being a young woman… the things that she (and Brandi) were denied by having been murdered at a young age by the Lanthian priests.

    She got some of what she asked for… behaving impulsively and heedlessly, while bar-hopping and drunk is almost a rite of passage for college-age kids these days (and probably in every generation back to the original Beaker People).

    Regretting it the next morning is also part of the package. Welcome to young adulthood, Bud… here are your aspirin! 🙂

  15. kingklash
    January 18, 2012, 10:02 am | # | Reply

    I don’t know if “resilient” is what it is, as much as “stubborn enough to make the same mistake over and over until the correct action seeps past the first several layers of hard candy” as far as Comanches are concerned. But, as a wise man said, “If you fail a hundred times before you succeed, then you have learned one hundred and one things.”

    Budsy-Wudsy didn’t relate her encouragement, did she?

    • Dave
      January 18, 2012, 11:49 am | # | Reply

      As Spider Robinson put it in Mindkiller: The Universe is quite accommodating. It will willingly hit you square between the eyes with the thousand-pound s***hammer as many times as you require to wake up and listen to the message.

      But, yes, trying and failing is a necessary part of the process of learning and growing. It’s a bit easier if we work at not repeating any specific failure too many times, of course… but trying to avoid all failure will cost us many opportunities to succeed.

      No, Bud hasn’t yet fessed up to having been a goad… be interesting to see if she does.

  16. Yamara
    January 18, 2012, 10:22 am | # | Reply

    Why does this remind me of the conversations TV chefs have while they’re describing a recipe?

    Maybe Brandi’s manipulations aren’t so much like a chess match as they are like…

    …cooking.

    • The Old Wolf
      January 18, 2012, 10:35 am | # | Reply

      Related to nothing at all, thanks for all your great edits over at the wiki.

      • Yamara
        January 18, 2012, 11:49 pm | #

        Old Wolf: My pleasure.

        Dave: I realize Bud’s a senior citizen, but I don’t think that she makes broth in bed.

        I suppose she might after big binge night, though. In theory.

      • Wyvern
        January 19, 2012, 10:40 pm | #

        For those not paying attention, the Wapsi Square wiki is right here. If you’re reading this, you probably know enough to care – even to help!

    • Dave
      January 18, 2012, 11:33 am | # | Reply

      You’re saying that Brandi is simply cooking up mischief, manipulating her friends and their love/sex lives in order to make a broth out of a bed situation. Shame on you… that’s a terrible pun.

      As least Brandi isn’t drinking as much while cooking as Graham Kerr used to do…

      • illiad
        January 18, 2012, 2:06 pm | #

        ahhh. Graham Kerr, the galloping gourmet!!! 🙂 🙂 check his wiki, he is still living in mount vernon! 🙂

  17. DSL
    January 18, 2012, 11:43 am | # | Reply

    “Patched holes in her soul.” Awesome phrase.

Comment ¬ Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Home
  • About
  • Book Store
  • Bluesky
  • Twitch
  • Forum
  • Archive

©2001-2025 Paul Taylor | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑